One campaign. Six teams served.
Compliance, purchasing, risk, sustainability, network and executive teams all ask questions about the same third parties. Triskali answers them from one set of data.
What each team needs, and what it gets
Compliance Manager
You need documented proof that every partner was assessed, on a consistent framework.
- One method for every third party
- Dated records with evidence attached
- Audit trail across cycles
What you getA defensible due diligence file, ready for regulators and auditors.
Purchasing Manager
You need comparable scores across your supplier panel to decide who to retain, develop or replace.
- Scores on one scale across countries
- Peer benchmarks per category
- Strengths and gaps per supplier
What you getSupplier decisions you can defend in front of procurement and the board.
Risk Manager
You need a consolidated view of exposure across the network, not twelve local reports.
- Four dimensions, including financial strength
- Independent third-party financial data
- Trends across cycles
What you getNetwork exposure in one view, with the weakest links flagged.
Sustainability Manager
You need evidence-based environmental and social data, and a carbon footprint you can consolidate.
- Evidence at the point of answer
- Scope 1, 2 and 3 carbon module
- Improvement plans per partner
What you getCSRD-ready network figures an auditor will accept.
Network Manager
You need one directory of owned entities and third parties, and live campaign coverage.
- Entities, perimeters and owners in one place
- Real-time completion by country
- Automated reminders
What you getOne campaign instead of twelve parallel e-mail chains.
General Management
You need to know what the group actually knows about the companies around it, and prove it.
- Portfolio dashboards
- Peer position of each entity
- Progress measured cycle after cycle
What you getA common language between teams, network and auditors.
What it changes, depending on where you sit



You run a network
- See every entity on one comparable scale, not twelve local reports
- Run one campaign instead of twelve parallel e-mail chains
- Consolidate network figures for CSRD without re-keying anything
- Direct effort where the gap is widest, with evidence to back it
You sell through a network
- Measure the distributors and partners that carry your brand
- Answer customer ESG questionnaires once, reuse them everywhere
- Segment commercial programmes by maturity, not by intuition
- Evidence your scope 3 distribution footprint with real data
You run a supplier panel
- A partner programme with a defensible, independent scale
- Label and certification pathways aligned with recognised standards
- Third-party due diligence and network exposure in one view
- A common language between your teams, network and auditors
What every assessed company receives
Partners complete one assessment. Each internal team gets its own view, on the same shared record, cycle after cycle.
Four-dimension score
Sustainability, corporate processes, business integrity & human rights, and financial strength.
Peer group benchmark
Anonymised distribution curves that show where the score actually sits.
Evidence-linked findings
Every strength and gap is tied to its source documents.
Prioritised actions
An improvement path, with practices from comparable companies.
- Country
- France
- Category
- Wholesaler with service network
- Perimeter
- Distributor · Tier 1
- Member of
- Group network West
Third-party due diligence is already enforced
Different scopes, thresholds and penalties, all applying to the same panel of suppliers at the same time.
| Framework | Jurisdiction | What it requires | Exposure |
|---|---|---|---|
| CS3D | European Union | Due diligence across the chain of activities | Fines up to 3% of worldwide turnover; application 26 July 2029 |
| Duty of vigilance | France | Vigilance plan covering subsidiaries, suppliers and subcontractors | Civil liability; first conviction confirmed on appeal in June 2025 |
| Sapin II | France | Third-party anti-corruption assessment | Up to €200k for executives, €1M for companies |
| LkSG | Germany | Supply chain risk analysis and preventive measures | Fines up to €8M or 2% of turnover |
| Transparency Act | Norway | Due diligence and public reporting on human rights | Penalties already issued |
See your network through each team's eyes.
Bring us a list of twenty entities or suppliers. We will show you what the platform makes of it: the directory, an adapted questionnaire, and the benchmark they would sit in.
